Every feature in Sentry exists to address a specific failure mode of the way legal teams currently compare documents.
Sentry applies a consistent, predefined comparison methodology to every document pair. Not a different prompt entered differently each time. What you asked for is what you get — every time, for every person on your team.
Changes are not just identified — they are categorised by risk significance. Material clause changes are surfaced prominently. Minor formatting differences are separated from substantive legal changes.
Your documents do not become training data. Sentry processes sensitive legal documents in a controlled, secure environment with appropriate handling for NDA-level confidentiality. What goes in stays in.
Every comparison run is logged — who initiated it, which documents were compared, what the output was, and when. Your review process is documented and defensible, not ephemeral.
Purpose-built for the document types legal teams compare most. NDAs, access letters, term sheets — compared with a methodology that knows what to look for.
Changes categorised by risk significance. Jurisdiction shifts, term extensions, liability caps — flagged and highlighted, not buried in tracked changes.
Every comparison assigned a unique reference ID, timestamped, and linked to the user. Your review history is searchable and permanently available.
Who can compare which documents, and who can see the results — controlled at the team level. A managed environment, not a shared inbox.
What used to take an hour of side-by-side reading takes minutes in Sentry. Reduce review time without reducing review quality.
Track change history across versions and counterparties through multiple rounds of markup and return.
Compare 2 documents at no cost — no credit card required.